@article{oai:icabs.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000032, author = {落合俊典}, issue = {15}, journal = {国際仏教学大学院大学研究紀要, Journal of the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies}, month = {May}, note = {110008690317, The Prajnāpāramitāhṛdaya, which was translated into Chinese around the middle of the 7th century in Tang dynasty, is an extremely short Buddhist text, yet innumerable studies have been devoted to it. Despite this, scholars have traditionally had to rely only on 11 Tang-era commentaries known. In this paper, I wish to present a newly discovered Tang-era commentary on the Prajnāpāramitāhṛdaya. The author is Feng Wudai, a scholarly bureaucrat in the Tang court whose official title was “Bureau Director” in the Ministry of Justice. He was a member of the same Feng clan that is mentioned in the 新唐書宰相世系表Xin Tang shu衾zaixiang shixi biao (New Book of Tang: Genealogical Table of Chancellors). This work is preserved in Shinpuku-ji, a temple in Nagoya City perhaps better known by its other name Ōsu Kannon. The manuscript was copied in Year 2 of the Genkō Era (1322 CE). The fact that this Tang-era commentary was discovered in the collections of an old Japanese Buddhist temple not only corroborates the notion that Tang Buddhism was widely accepted in Japan, it is also very significant in that it was compiled not by a scholarly monk schooled in the tenets of Buddhism, but rather by civil servant in the government, namely a bureau director in the Ministry of Justice. There are few accounts of the life of Feng Wudai, but from his own 注心経Commentary on the Prajnāpāramitāhṛdaya we can deduce that he wasfamiliar with Buddhism from a young age and had studied it. In particular, it appears he had an interest in prajnā doctrine, in interest which is reflected in his commentary. Let us now look at the specific period in the Tang Dynasty in which Feng Wudai was active. The first major clue is the year in which his wife is thought to have died. Cen Zhongmianʼs 元和姓纂四校記(Yuan he xing zuan si jiao ji) tells that an inscription on his wife Liʼs grave places her death at Year 8 of the Kaiyuan Era (720 CE). If we accept this evidence, Bureau Director Feng Wudai in the Ministry of Justice was active from the reign of the Tang rulers Gaozong and Wu Zetian to the era of Xuanzong. It is not uncommon for interpretations of Buddhist works given by nonspecialists to be subject to a considerable amount of scrutiny. This rule of thumb applies all the more so when dealing with a specialized subject such as prajnā studies, where much effort is put into persuading prajnā specialists. It is often the case, however, for such works to exhibit slightly inexpedient readings of Sanskrit that are often inaccurate in the given context. I hope to avoid that in this paper by placing the focus on reproducing Wudaiʼ s text and in doing so merely make a few simple observations on certain aspects of ideas and scholarship on the topic.}, pages = {1--52}, title = {刑部郎中封無待撰『注心経并序』本文と小考}, year = {2011}, yomi = {オチアイ, トシノリ} }