ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • コミュニティ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 仙石山論集 1-4
  2. 第2号

日本における『金七十論』とその注釈書について

https://doi.org/10.15056/00000111
https://doi.org/10.15056/00000111
e9394579-3e60-4a3f-a5b2-cd29efb54658
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
仙石山論集 日本における『金七十論』とその注釈書について (12.6 MB)
license.icon
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2013-08-01
タイトル
タイトル 日本における『金七十論』とその注釈書について
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Traditional Japanese Commentaries on the Suvarṇasaptatiśāstra 金七十論
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15056/00000111
ID登録タイプ JaLC
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 興津, 香織

× 興津, 香織

CiNii ID 1390009224880728960

ja 興津, 香織
ISNI 国際仏教学大学院大学 0000 0001 2232 4194

ja-Kana オキツ, カオリ

en Okitsu, Kaori
Kaori Okitsu

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 It is not unusual to see Buddhist texts mentioning and criticising other philosophical schools. Amongst these, Sāṁkhya and Vaiśeṣika have received particular attention. The fact that the *Suvarṇasaptatiśāstra (hereafter, Ss), translated by Paramārtha 眞諦, and the *Vaiśeṣikadaśapadārthaśāstra 勝宗十句義論, translated by Xuanzang 玄奘, are the only treatises of classical Indian systems rendered into Chinese and included in the Chinese Canon also testifies to the importance attached to these two schools. The way Buddhist thinkers regarded Sāṁkhya philosophy can be grasped from two angles. One is to survey their criticism against this system as reflected in Buddhist philosophical works. The other is to examine how the Ss was understood and assessed in commentaries written by Far Eastern Buddhist thinkers. The latter approach has not been attempted so far, and the present paper is part of a larger project to explore this less known aspect in the history of ideas. It seems that no exegetical work was written on the Ss in traditional China. By contrast, Japanese Buddhists showed considerable interest in this Sāṁkhya text. This can be seen as early as the Tenpyō Era (729-767), when the name of the Ss appears amongst the manuscripts copied by imperial order. We have no concrete data for the following centuries, but later, by the middle of the Tokugawa Period (18th century), the Ss became the object of an intense commentarial activity. Unfortunately, only very few of these works were printed and became available to the general public. Most of the rest has remained practically unknown to outside circles. As much as I could check, no less than 26 commentaries on the Ss (including texts no longer extant) were written during the Tokugawa Period. We know the names of 17 of these exegetes. For three of the commentaries, the authors’ names have been lost. An important figure, which I also briefly discuss, is Nyokai Nichimyō 如海日妙 (?-1711) who appears to have written or edited the ‘Postface to the *Suvarṇasaptatiśāstra’ 金七十論跋 attached to the woodblock print edition of the Ss issued in the Tokugawa Period. My paper also examines the texts and materials used by the scholar-monks associated with the Ss exegetical literature, the common corpus of knowledge shared by them as well as the distinctive characteristics of each of the available commentaries. I have paid special attention to the following three works which illustrate the philological methods of textual interpretation representative of this age: the Kon shichijū ron bikō 金七十論備考 by Gyō’ ō Gonzō 曉應嚴藏 (1724-1785), the Kon shichijū ron sho 金七十論疏 by Chidō Hōjū 智幢法住 (1723-1800), and the Kon shichijū ron sōkyō 金七十論藻鏡 by Rinjō Kaidō 林常快道 (1751-1810).
書誌情報 ja : 仙石山論集
en : Sengokuyama Journal of Buddhist Studies

巻 2, p. 31-59, ページ数 29, 発行日 2005-09-30
出版者
出版者 国際仏教学大学院大学
言語 ja
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 1349-4341
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA11991489
論文ID(NAID)
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 110009328544
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-20 16:21:36.006705
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3