WEKO3
インデックスリンク
アイテム
『釈摩訶衍論』における「不守自性随縁」概念の独自性について
https://doi.org/10.15056/00000249
https://doi.org/10.15056/00000249f18146cc-bf6b-4b47-8528-85848855c621
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
『釈摩訶衍論』における「不守自性随縁」概念の独自性について (925.5 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-09-09 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 『釈摩訶衍論』における「不守自性随縁」概念の独自性について | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | A particular aspect of concept of (shinnyo) Fushujisho-zuien as mentioned in the Shaku-makaen-ron | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15056/00000249 | |||||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
早川, 道雄
× 早川, 道雄
KAKEN - 研究者検索
80002038
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Fushujisho(不守自性)means that Shinnyo(真如)loses its essence. Zuien(随縁), consequently, means that Shinnyo presents itself as the creation of purity and dirt. The first one, who used this concept was Hozo, a master of chinese Kegon master. He did it for ranking the other schools and doctrines, to which he attributed lesser values under the Kegon school. Kuhai, however, the first patriarch of Japanese shingon school, gave to this concept an interpretation for summerizing the Kegon philosophy in his works. I think, that his heterodox use of this concept is based on the alterd interpretation, as it is found in Shaku-makaen-ron(釈摩訶衍論), on which he set much value. Hozo always used this concept contrastively as a pair together with the concept of Shinnyo, which he described as presenting itself, while retaining its essence (Zuien-Fushitujisho随縁不失自性). The author of Shaku-makaen-ron, however, emphasized only Fushujisho-zuien. His motivation was, probably, to claim that Kegon's truth must be confirmed by religious practice. His intention was not a denial of the Kegon school, but a supplement or a perfection of it. Kuukai had probably understood the intention of the Shaku-makaen-ron's author. He, however, adopted only the framework of religious practice for founding his own system, the new shingon school. He therefore also descriminated the Kegon school by explaining that it reduces itself to the concept of Fushujisho-zuien. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 国際仏教学大学院大学研究紀要 en : Journal of the International College for Advanced Buddhist Studies 巻 4, p. 159-178, ページ数 20, 発行日 2001-03-31 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 国際仏教学大学院大学 | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1343-4128 | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11260687 | |||||||||||
| 論文ID（NAID） | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 110006481965 | |||||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||
