WEKO3
インデックスリンク
アイテム
ツォンカパにおける「非有・非無」の解釈
https://doi.org/10.15056/00000269
https://doi.org/10.15056/00000269b8e54b58-7572-44d1-b8d8-25a3b76a9239
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ツォンカパにおける「非有・非無」の解釈 (925.2 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-09-10 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | ツォンカパにおける「非有・非無」の解釈 | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | Tsong ka pa's Two Interpretations of "Neither Existence nor Non-existence" | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15056/00000269 | |||||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
四津谷, 孝道
× 四津谷, 孝道
CiNii ID
1410572174834178688
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | The Middle Way may be, roughly speaking, understood from the philosophical point of view that things are neither existent nor nonexistent(非有非無). Nagarjuna seems to assume that this philosophical understanding of the Middle Way is taught so as to cancel any discursive knowledge whatsoever, including discursive knowledge of existence and that of non-existence, both of which pertain to the most fundamental categories by which to comprehend phenomena. Tsong kha pa gives two sorts of interpretations of "neither existcnce nor non-existence." In a context which concerns "the four alternative positions" (catuh-koti) along the same lins as Nagarjuna does and assumes that one should negate any discursive knowledge whatsoever that presupposes hypothesized entitics, namely, not only hypothesized existence (有), but hypothesized non-existence (無) as well. However, unlike other Madhyamaka followers, including Nagarjuna, he thinks that mental activities should be classified as virtuous (prajna) viz. the understanding of non-substantiality (vicious). We must not discard the former. In another context, he gives another interpretation of it in terms of the "two truths theory" (satya-dvaya). It shows that the hypothesized entities are denied on the uhimate level(非有), but everyday things must remain undenied(非無)on the conventional level. | |||||||||||
| bibliographic_information |
ja : 国際仏教学大学院大学研究紀要 en : Journal of the International College for Advanced Buddhist Studies 巻 3, p. 354-333, ページ数 22, 発行日 2000-03-31 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 国際仏教学大学院大学 | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||
| item_10002_source_id_9 | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1343-4128 | |||||||||||
| item_10002_source_id_11 | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11260687 | |||||||||||
| item_10002_description_12 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 110006481958 | |||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||
